Steve Ratts
- Total activity 499
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 251
- Subscriptions 105
Activity overview
Latest activity by Steve Ratts-
Steve Ratts commented,
Kyle it seems Skylum has given up on fixing the damn DAM. This has been an issue since the release of L3 and has been posted about many times. There’s a find missing photos option that is supposed ...
-
Steve Ratts commented,
This would be great! I'd like to do this as well. Please consider adding this to the roadmap.
-
Steve Ratts commented,
Dawn Barton, there's a similar way if you're using a MAC that was previously posted on this forum. It involves clicking on the L4 app and opening it's contents (the .app file is really a package wi...
-
Steve Ratts commented,
I'll second this. It's just plain silly that Luminar can't do watermarks without ridiculous SW contortions. There are some really great new capabilities in L4. I've tried it on two machines - a 201...
-
Steve Ratts commented,
Can you please elaborate on how a user may be able to add their own sky photos for use in the AI Sky Replacement tool?
-
Steve Ratts commented,
A better question is when. It's not out yet, which is why you haven't found it.
-
Steve Ratts commented,
Availability on IOS would certainly be a game changer for folks like you, but is that really your number one concern relative to ditching Adobe and Lightroom? How do you plan to migrate your existi...
-
Steve Ratts commented,
As Dave indicated above, the link is useless. It will only get you a copy of Luminar 3.1.3, and not Luminar 3.1.4. Sooo... You can't get the update by clicking Check for Updates in 3.1.3. You'll ju...
-
Steve Ratts commented,
Yeah, I think you guys might be right. We might never see a DAM in Luminar. I think Skylum has gotten a mixed message from the user base. There are those who never wanted it, and resented the effor...
-
Steve Ratts commented,
@Geoffrey What do you think an alternative is? If I’ve got A and B is marketed as an alternative then presumably I could replace A with B assuming that B in fact is an alternative. So just because...