I'm 'just' a hobby photographer, and Windows user.
I used PS - but moved to Luminar as my standalone copy of PS was getting dated, and I didn't consider my need sufficient to purchase an on-line copy from Adobe.
I pre-ordered Luminar 4 - but why I don't know, I guess it was in anticipation of Luminar 4 eventually replacing Luminar 3.
It seems that isn't the case.
So why is Skylum supporting both Luminar 3 and Luminar 4, rather than concentrating on just the one product? I'm not interested in plug-in uses, just a one-stop-shop for all my needs. (It's bad enough I have to use Capture One to edit my RAW IR shots, for WB - Skylum are working on a solution - still!).
I can edit my Fuji XE1 RAW files in Luminar, but not in Luminar 3. I hope Luminar 4 will improve on that. I prefer Luminar, to Luminar 3 because of the DAM - can that be toggled on/off?
So, Why Luminar 3 and Luminar 4, rather than one great product?
Please sign in to leave a comment.