Luminar 4 ? I want Luminar 3 first!

Comments

3 comments

  • Avatar
    Mirco Egon In-Albon

    Max, i guess they are running out of Money

    11
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Ian McPhee

    “Wannabes” perhaps a little harsh for the many of us who do have thousands (rather than 10s of thousands!) of images, and who, just as do the “professional photo editors”, want a platform that is fully functional, stable and subject to upgrades at reasonable interval...... something that, for all of us, is NOT the case with L3. For me, it’s back to Picture Window Pro. Sure, there are no layers, RAW editing, or for that matter any of the cute, arguably gimmicky tricks built in, but it’s powerful and rock solid! Free, or by “donation” if you wish.

    4
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    L

    Yeah! I am still editing in L2018. L3 lacks in so many parts, especially in the missing .lmnr and a not usefull DAM, there is no point to work with it. We all payed for a pre-beta version of the maybebetaversion of L4. Nothing of the promised advantages in L3 works fine, if at all. So it is time to go and use a proper working software like C1. Sadly, there is no point to trust Sylum and ther promises anymore.

    5
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.