Luminar 4 ? I want Luminar 3 first!
you can't be serious going public with Luminar 4! Luminar 3 still isn't where it is supposed to be in terms of the DAM but instead on delivering on the promises, there is another feature-loaded - paid as it seems - update? Please fix the following issues first:
1) Proper Exif-Support for the DAM (geotagging, adjust date & time)
2) RAW support for modern cameras, especially canon CR3
3) Performance! (proper utilisation of CPU / GPU for editing & rendering of RAW)
And if there are resources left, proper metainformation handling or tagging or even AI based object recognition would make more sense than replacing the sky. This development clearly does not go in a direction to professional photo editors but some nonsensical playground for wannabes.
-
“Wannabes” perhaps a little harsh for the many of us who do have thousands (rather than 10s of thousands!) of images, and who, just as do the “professional photo editors”, want a platform that is fully functional, stable and subject to upgrades at reasonable interval...... something that, for all of us, is NOT the case with L3. For me, it’s back to Picture Window Pro. Sure, there are no layers, RAW editing, or for that matter any of the cute, arguably gimmicky tricks built in, but it’s powerful and rock solid! Free, or by “donation” if you wish.
-
Yeah! I am still editing in L2018. L3 lacks in so many parts, especially in the missing .lmnr and a not usefull DAM, there is no point to work with it. We all payed for a pre-beta version of the maybebetaversion of L4. Nothing of the promised advantages in L3 works fine, if at all. So it is time to go and use a proper working software like C1. Sadly, there is no point to trust Sylum and ther promises anymore.
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
3 comments