I wonder if the beta testers looked into how the software would perform when loaded with 100,000 photos and 4 TB of data. This is not unreasonable load for a photographer shooting RAW for 10 years. My supposition is that Luminar 3 would be unbearably slow and unstable and so I just loaded two folders to play with it.
Did you beta test for use with such huge Libraries? If so, was the program still reasonably stable and speedy in a demanding workflow? If not, it is something to consider. If so, is there a recommended limit to maintain reasonable performance?
Also, it is not mentioned in the roadmap but it would be useful to see the entire folder structure of the computer under folders in Luminar to know where a photo is located. Example, is this a photo on the screen on the C or D drive on the computer hard drive or from an external hard drive or coming from the cloud somewhere?
Please sign in to leave a comment.