Slim Face 2.0 suggestions
AnsweredI found the new Slim Face 2.0 is worse than the 1.0 version in some cases. I used the Slim Face feature quite a lot before I upgraded to 4.2, it actually worked pretty well if you don't slide the bar over 50. With skin enhancer, I was able to skip Photoshop 90% of the time.
However, with Slim Face 2.0, it looks like the subject's eyes and nose are squeezed together, which creates a much more unrealistic result. Now I have to go back to Photoshop if I need to do a face slimming. I can understand the development team is trying to make both the upper and the lower portion smaller, but the ratio is definitely wrong right now. Photoshop and a lot of mobile photo editors can do face slimming without moving or resizing the subject's facial features, maybe the dev team could use them as examples.
I think it would be better if we can also have the option to tune the lower portion of the face (jawbone) separately, or offer something similar to Photoshop's liquify tool to make the face smaller without modifying facial features.
Thank you very much for listening to our suggestions.
-
Official comment
Hi Neil,
Thank you so much for sharing your feedback! I'll make sure to forward it to our developers.
Comment actions
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
1 comment